The
private ownership of guns is an especially contentious political topic in
the United States, where the
Second Amendment
to the U.S. Constitution states:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
(1789)
Gloser:
amendment:
tilføjelse til forfatningen.
infringe: krænke
the gun rights advocates (or the gun rights lobby),
especially the National Rifle Association
the gun control advocates.
The
gun rights advocates believe the Second Amendment protects
individual citizens’ right to keep and bear arms for self-defence (i.e.
against the government)
-
whereas the gun control advocates claim that the Second Amendment protects the rights
of the states to maintain a State militia against the interference of the
federal government.
Gun
rights advocates
assert that gun control laws are ineffective because criminals ignore gun
control laws. Instead a lawfully armed citizen may avert a crime by
confronting a would-be attacker with a loaded gun.
Gun rights advocates
also claim that an armed citizenry is the population’s last line of
defence against tyranny by their own government. (From Wikipedia)
A pro-gun slogan: “Guns don't kill people, people do.”
1. Gun
violence
Study the Time, CNNand Guardianwebsites
below.
Find important information about
gun violence in the USA today.
Print ½-1 page – and prepare a discussion
about an important issue.
Guns
and ViolenceTime
Inc. Articles about American attitudes to guns,
analysis of the recent school shootings, articles about the connection
between violence on screen and in real life and articles on children’s
aggressions. -
The Supreme Court and the Second Amendment
Study the gun lobby’s websites.
Find important arguments for the
individual’s right to keep and bear arms.
Print ½-1 page – and prepare a
discussion about an important issue.
This
arrow means that the following webpages are particularly relevant.
Waco, Texas, 1993:
The reactions to the events at
Waco, Texas, may be studied to learn how many Americans feel the need
to defend the rights of the individual against so-called government
tyranny. The Oklahoma bombing may be
studied along the same lines.
The Waco
Massacre"Is this
the future of the United States, with law-abiding citizens murdered at
will by agents of the government?" This site has many
links
Background:
WacoNew
revalations have emerged about the raid on the
Branch Davidian compound.
TIME.com takes a look back at
the events of 1993, and the subsequent investigation.
Study the debate about
Bowling for
Columbine.
Point out some of the fundamental issues in the debate.
Print ½-1 page –
and prepare a discussion about an important issue.
Film
Bowling for Columbine
(2002). Director:
Michael Moore.
Running
time: 120 mins.
- "Are we a nation of gun nuts or are
we just nuts?" Activist
filmmaker Michael Moore sets out to explore the roots of America's
predilection for gun violence in this documentary film. It is a journey
through America, hoping to discover why Americans pursuit of happiness
is so riddled with violence. Furthermore, Moore seeks to investigate and
confront the powerful elite, political and corporate interests fanning
this culture for their own unscrupulous gain. (Film Education)
Bowling for
ColumbineWebsite
of the Oscar-winning documentary based on the 1999 massacre at an
American High School in Colorado.
- Teacher’s guide
Bowling for
truth"This
website is here as a resource to expose the distortions and dishonesty
in fictitious film director Michael Moore's Oscar winning documentary, Bowling For Columbine."
Spinsanity
“Viewer beware. In "Bowling for Columbine," Michael Moore
once again puts distortions and contradictions before the truth.”